Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Matazo and 29 for Saka, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Matazo vs Saka

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 26 projected points.

Matazo

HULL CITY · MID · £4.5

projected points / 5 GW

Sell92%

EVE (H)FUL (A)BRE (H)IPS (H)ARS (A)

Saka

ARSENAL · MID · £9.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Stat by stat

£4.5Price£9.5

0Total points32

0.0Form5.8

0.0Points / game6.4

0.0%Owned13.7%

0Minutes416

0Goals3

0Assists0

0.00xG3.22

0.00xA0.98

0.0ICT52.1

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

3Projected pts29

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (29 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Matazo.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Matazo vs Groß Matazo vs Schade Matazo vs Cherki Matazo vs Semenyo Matazo vs Gakpo Matazo vs Tavernier