Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 9 points for Palacios and 21 for Rogers, so Rogers is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Palacios vs Rogers

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Rogers by 12 projected points.

Palacios

IPSWICH TOWN · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

FUL (H)MCI (A)NFO (H)HUL (A)BOU (H)

Rogers

CHELSEA · MID · £7.9

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

BOU (H)EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£7.9

12Total points38

1.5Form5.5

2.4Points / game6.3

0.1%Owned44.5%

302Minutes520

0Goals4

0Assists1

0.00xG1.90

0.11xA1.30

10.6ICT43.9

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.0

9Projected pts21

The verdict

Rogers comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (21 vs 9), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Palacios.

Buy — Rogers is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Palacios vs Groß Palacios vs Cherki Palacios vs Schade Palacios vs Belloumi Palacios vs Palmer Palacios vs Semenyo