Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 5 points for Quenda and 29 for Saka, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Quenda vs Saka

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 24 projected points.

Quenda

CHELSEA · MID · £5.3

projected points / 5 GW

Sell78%

BOU (H)EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)

Saka

ARSENAL · MID · £9.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Stat by stat

£5.3Price£9.5

2Total points32

0.3Form5.8

1.0Points / game6.4

0.0%Owned13.7%

27Minutes416

0Goals3

0Assists0

0.03xG3.22

0.01xA0.98

1.2ICT52.1

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.0

5Projected pts29

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (29 vs 5), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Quenda.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Quenda vs Groß Quenda vs Schade Quenda vs Cherki Quenda vs Semenyo Quenda vs Gakpo Quenda vs Tavernier