Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 15 points for Armstrong and 12 for Neto, so Armstrong is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Armstrong vs Neto

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Armstrong by 2 projected points.

Armstrong

EVERTON · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

BOU (A)MUN (H)TOT (A)IPS (H)HUL (A)

Neto

CHELSEA · MID · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Hold57%

BHA (H)ARS (A)HUL (H)BRE (A)BOU (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£6.5

10Total points9

5.0Form4.5

5.0Points / game4.5

0.3%Owned1.2%

176Minutes59

0Goals1

1Assists0

0.00xG0.34

0.07xA0.46

4.8ICT1.3

2.8Avg FDR (5)3.0

15Projected pts12

The verdict

Armstrong comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (15 vs 12), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 2.8) and better current form.

Buy — Armstrong is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Hold — Neto is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More MID comparisons

Armstrong vs Cherki Armstrong vs Gakpo Armstrong vs Elanga Armstrong vs Lewis-Potter Armstrong vs Hinshelwood Armstrong vs M.Sangaré