Strand Larsen or McBurnie?

Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 8 points for Strand Larsen and 16 for McBurnie, so McBurnie is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Strand Larsen vs McBurnie

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours McBurnie by 8 projected points.

Strand Larsen

Crystal Palace · FWD · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

EVE (A)MCI (H)FUL (A)IPS (H)LEE (A)

McBurnie

Hull City · FWD · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

MUN (H)COV (A)AVL (H)CHE (A)NEW (A)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£5.5

1Total points5

1.0Form5.0

1.0Points / game5.0

0.6%Owned1.4%

27Minutes90

0Goals0

0Assists1

0.24xG0.10

0.01xA0.01

0.0ICT0.0

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.2

8Projected pts16

The verdict

McBurnie comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (16 vs 8), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Strand Larsen.

Buy — McBurnie is one of the better FWD options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More FWD comparisons

Strand Larsen vs Emersonn Strand Larsen vs Barry Strand Larsen vs Havertz Strand Larsen vs Thomas-Asante Strand Larsen vs Simms Strand Larsen vs Mateta