Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for J.Ramsey and 29 for Saka, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

J.Ramsey vs Saka

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 26 projected points.

J.Ramsey

NEWCASTLE · MID · £4.9

projected points / 5 GW

Sell85%

COV (A)AVL (H)CRY (A)EVE (H)FUL (A)

Saka

ARSENAL · MID · £9.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Stat by stat

£4.9Price£9.5

7Total points32

2.0Form5.8

2.3Points / game6.4

0.2%Owned13.7%

69Minutes416

1Goals3

0Assists0

0.17xG3.22

0.16xA0.98

6.7ICT52.1

2.8Avg FDR (5)3.0

3Projected pts29

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (29 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping J.Ramsey.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

J.Ramsey vs Groß J.Ramsey vs Schade J.Ramsey vs Cherki J.Ramsey vs Semenyo J.Ramsey vs Gakpo J.Ramsey vs Tavernier