Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 5 points for Gelhardt and 29 for Saka, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Gelhardt vs Saka

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 24 projected points.

Gelhardt

HULL CITY · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell78%

EVE (H)FUL (A)BRE (H)IPS (H)ARS (A)

Saka

ARSENAL · MID · £9.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£9.5

1Total points32

0.3Form5.8

1.0Points / game6.4

0.0%Owned13.7%

7Minutes416

0Goals3

0Assists0

0.10xG3.22

0.02xA0.98

1.5ICT52.1

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

5Projected pts29

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (29 vs 5), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Gelhardt.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Gelhardt vs Groß Gelhardt vs Schade Gelhardt vs Cherki Gelhardt vs Semenyo Gelhardt vs Gakpo Gelhardt vs Tavernier