Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 19 points for Schade and 19 for Scott, so Scott is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Schade vs Scott

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Scott by 0 projected points.

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

SUN (H)BOU (A)CHE (H)AVL (A)LIV (H)

Scott

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

NEW (A)BRE (H)LIV (H)CHE (A)SUN (H)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£6.0

13Total points24

4.3Form8.0

6.5Points / game8.0

4.3%Owned2.1%

177Minutes266

1Goals1

0Assists2

0.77xG0.32

0.03xA0.30

17.6ICT11.7

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.2

19Projected pts19

The verdict

Scott comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (19 vs 19), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Scott is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Schade vs Gakpo Schade vs B.Fernandes Schade vs Cherki Schade vs Tavernier Schade vs Saka Schade vs Palmer