Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 15 points for Schade and 15 for King, so Schade is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Schade vs King

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Schade by 0 projected points.

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Hold50%

LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)EVE (H)

King

FULHAM · MID · £5.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

HUL (H)COV (A)AVL (A)NEW (H)MCI (A)

Stat by stat

£6.2Price£5.6

40Total points26

5.0Form2.0

6.7Points / game4.3

15.1%Owned4.7%

498Minutes500

3Goals2

2Assists0

1.93xG1.54

0.33xA0.74

38.4ICT39.1

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

15Projected pts15

The verdict

Schade comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (15 vs 15), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Hold — Schade is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

Buy — King is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Schade vs Groß Schade vs Cherki Schade vs Rogers Schade vs Belloumi Schade vs Palmer Schade vs Semenyo