Schade vs Gibbs-White
Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Gibbs-White by 1 projected points.
Schade
Schade
BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2
22
projected points / 5 GW
AVL (A)LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)
Gibbs-White
Gibbs-White
NOTT'M FOREST · MID · £8.0
23
projected points / 5 GW
CRY (A)ARS (H)IPS (A)BRE (A)MCI (H)
Stat by stat
£6.2Price£8.0
39Total points28
8.7Form4.3
7.8Points / game5.6
11.5%Owned15.7%
447Minutes450
3Goals1
2Assists2
1.52xG1.56
0.32xA1.42
35.4ICT40.6
3.2Avg FDR (5)3.2
22Projected pts23
The verdict
Gibbs-White comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (23 vs 22), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and a stronger underlying profile.
Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.
Buy — Gibbs-White is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.