Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 18 points for Schade and 18 for Neto, so Schade is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Schade vs Neto

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Schade by 0 projected points.

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)EVE (H)

Neto

CHELSEA · MID · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)LEE (H)

Stat by stat

£6.2Price£6.5

41Total points34

3.7Form7.3

5.9Points / game4.9

13.6%Owned1.5%

499Minutes504

3Goals3

2Assists1

1.93xG1.22

0.33xA0.87

38.4ICT34.8

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

18Projected pts18

The verdict

Schade comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (18 vs 18), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Neto is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Schade vs Groß Schade vs Cherki Schade vs Rogers Schade vs Palmer Schade vs Belloumi Schade vs Semenyo