Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 19 points for Tavernier and 12 for Kamada, so Tavernier is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Tavernier vs Kamada

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Tavernier by 7 projected points.

Tavernier

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

EVE (H)NEW (A)BRE (H)LIV (H)CHE (A)

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Hold64%

MCI (H)FUL (A)IPS (H)LEE (A)NFO (H)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£5.0

10Total points5

5.0Form2.5

10.0Points / game2.5

2.5%Owned0.3%

90Minutes180

1Goals0

0Assists0

0.40xG0.03

0.08xA0.29

7.5ICT5.0

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.0

19Projected pts12

The verdict

Tavernier comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (19 vs 12), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Buy — Tavernier is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Hold — Kamada is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More MID comparisons

Tavernier vs Cherki Tavernier vs Hinshelwood Tavernier vs M.Sangaré Tavernier vs Palmer Tavernier vs Stach Tavernier vs Gakpo