Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 21 points for Tavernier and 21 for Rogers, so Rogers is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Tavernier vs Rogers

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Rogers by 0 projected points.

Tavernier

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.1

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

CHE (A)SUN (H)MUN (A)LEE (H)IPS (A)

Rogers

CHELSEA · MID · £7.7

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

BOU (H)EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)

Stat by stat

£6.1Price£7.7

31Total points29

6.7Form5.3

6.2Points / game5.8

6.8%Owned40.5%

424Minutes437

3Goals3

0Assists1

1.70xG1.72

0.92xA1.23

45.5ICT43.9

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

21Projected pts21

The verdict

Rogers comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (21 vs 21), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Tavernier is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Rogers is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Tavernier vs Groß Tavernier vs Schade Tavernier vs Cherki Tavernier vs Semenyo Tavernier vs Saka Tavernier vs Gakpo