Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 20 points for Rogers and 18 for Neto, so Rogers is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Rogers vs Neto

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Rogers by 2 projected points.

Rogers

CHELSEA · MID · £7.9

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)LEE (H)

Neto

CHELSEA · MID · £6.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)LEE (H)

Stat by stat

£7.9Price£6.5

40Total points34

4.3Form7.3

5.7Points / game4.9

47.2%Owned1.5%

610Minutes504

4Goals3

1Assists1

2.07xG1.22

1.36xA0.87

51.7ICT34.8

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.0

20Projected pts18

The verdict

Rogers comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (20 vs 18), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Rogers is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Neto is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Rogers vs Groß Rogers vs Cherki Rogers vs Schade Rogers vs Belloumi Rogers vs Palmer Rogers vs Semenyo