Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 16 points for McBurnie and 5 for Wood, so McBurnie is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

McBurnie vs Wood

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours McBurnie by 10 projected points.

McBurnie

Hull City · FWD · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

MUN (H)COV (A)AVL (H)CHE (A)NEW (A)

Wood

Nott'm Forest · FWD · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell78%

LEE (H)LIV (A)TOT (H)AVL (A)COV (H)

Stat by stat

£5.5Price£6.0

5Total points1

5.0Form1.0

5.0Points / game1.0

1.3%Owned1.8%

90Minutes28

0Goals0

1Assists0

0.10xG0.07

0.01xA0.01

0.0ICT0.0

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

16Projected pts5

The verdict

McBurnie comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (16 vs 5), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Buy — McBurnie is one of the better FWD options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Wood.

More FWD comparisons

McBurnie vs Emersonn McBurnie vs Barry McBurnie vs Havertz McBurnie vs Thomas-Asante McBurnie vs Simms McBurnie vs Mateta