Gravenberch or Barnes?

Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 7 points for Gravenberch and 19 for Barnes, so Barnes is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Gravenberch vs Barnes

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Barnes by 12 projected points.

Gravenberch

LIVERPOOL · MID · £5.8

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

MCI (H)BRE (A)BHA (H)ARS (H)CRY (A)

Barnes

NEWCASTLE · MID · £6.1

projected points / 5 GW

Buy92%

COV (A)AVL (H)CRY (A)EVE (H)FUL (A)

Stat by stat

£5.8Price£6.1

9Total points28

1.0Form7.7

1.8Points / game5.6

1.1%Owned5.7%

190Minutes450

0Goals1

1Assists3

0.10xG0.62

0.08xA0.48

9.9ICT28.2

3.4Avg FDR (5)2.8

7Projected pts19

The verdict

Barnes comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (19 vs 7), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 2.8) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Gravenberch.

Buy — Barnes is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Gravenberch vs Groß Gravenberch vs Schade Gravenberch vs Cherki Gravenberch vs Semenyo Gravenberch vs Saka Gravenberch vs Gakpo