Gravenberch or Schade?

Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 7 points for Gravenberch and 22 for Schade, so Schade is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Gravenberch vs Schade

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Schade by 15 projected points.

Gravenberch

LIVERPOOL · MID · £5.8

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

MCI (H)BRE (A)BHA (H)ARS (H)CRY (A)

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

AVL (A)LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)

Stat by stat

£5.8Price£6.2

9Total points39

1.0Form8.7

1.8Points / game7.8

1.1%Owned11.5%

190Minutes447

0Goals3

1Assists2

0.10xG1.52

0.08xA0.32

9.9ICT35.4

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.2

7Projected pts22

The verdict

Schade comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (22 vs 7), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Gravenberch.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Gravenberch vs Groß Gravenberch vs Cherki Gravenberch vs Semenyo Gravenberch vs Saka Gravenberch vs Gakpo Gravenberch vs Tavernier