Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 11 points for Charles and 29 for Saka, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Charles vs Saka

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 18 projected points.

Charles

FULHAM · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

IPS (A)HUL (H)COV (A)AVL (A)NEW (H)

Saka

ARSENAL · MID · £9.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£9.5

13Total points32

3.7Form5.8

2.6Points / game6.4

0.1%Owned13.7%

303Minutes416

0Goals3

0Assists0

0.09xG3.22

0.16xA0.98

14.5ICT52.1

2.4Avg FDR (5)3.0

11Projected pts29

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (29 vs 11), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Buy — Charles is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Charles vs Groß Charles vs Schade Charles vs Cherki Charles vs Semenyo Charles vs Gakpo Charles vs Tavernier