Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 4 points for Iroegbunam and 19 for King, so King is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Iroegbunam vs King

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours King by 15 projected points.

Iroegbunam

HULL CITY · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell78%

EVE (H)FUL (A)BRE (H)IPS (H)ARS (A)

King

FULHAM · MID · £5.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy92%

IPS (A)HUL (H)COV (A)AVL (A)NEW (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£5.5

2Total points24

0.3Form5.0

0.7Points / game4.8

0.0%Owned2.6%

70Minutes425

0Goals2

0Assists0

0.12xG1.54

0.01xA0.46

3.1ICT35.8

3.2Avg FDR (5)2.4

4Projected pts19

The verdict

King comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (19 vs 4), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 2.4) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Iroegbunam.

Buy — King is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Iroegbunam vs Groß Iroegbunam vs Schade Iroegbunam vs Cherki Iroegbunam vs Semenyo Iroegbunam vs Saka Iroegbunam vs Gakpo