Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 29 points for Saka and 13 for Kamada, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Saka vs Kamada

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 15 projected points.

Saka

ARSENAL · MID · £9.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Stat by stat

£9.6Price£5.0

32Total points21

5.0Form5.5

6.4Points / game4.2

14.2%Owned0.5%

416Minutes441

3Goals0

0Assists3

3.22xG0.47

0.98xA0.38

52.1ICT21.9

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.4

29Projected pts13

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (29 vs 13), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Saka vs Groß Saka vs Schade Saka vs Cherki Saka vs Semenyo Saka vs Gakpo Saka vs Tavernier