Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 16 points for Kamada and 18 for Rice, so Rice is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Kamada vs Rice

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Rice by 2 projected points.

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Rice

ARSENAL · MID · £7.3

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£7.3

31Total points27

7.0Form4.7

5.2Points / game4.5

0.5%Owned10.7%

521Minutes501

1Goals0

3Assists3

1.02xG0.12

0.42xA0.77

21.9ICT23.4

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.0

16Projected pts18

The verdict

Rice comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (18 vs 16), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Rice is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Kamada vs Groß Kamada vs Schade Kamada vs Rogers Kamada vs Belloumi Kamada vs Palmer Kamada vs Cunha