Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 13 points for Kamada and 15 for Gomez, so Gomez is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Kamada vs Gomez

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Gomez by 1 projected points.

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Gomez

BRIGHTON · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

SUN (A)CRY (H)LIV (A)MCI (A)BRE (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£5.0

21Total points24

5.3Form4.3

4.2Points / game4.8

0.5%Owned4.0%

441Minutes433

0Goals0

3Assists3

0.47xG0.79

0.38xA0.78

21.9ICT31.4

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.4

13Projected pts15

The verdict

Gomez comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (15 vs 13), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Gomez is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Kamada vs Groß Kamada vs Schade Kamada vs Cherki Kamada vs Semenyo Kamada vs Saka Kamada vs Gakpo