Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 16 points for Kamada and 17 for Barnes, so Barnes is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Kamada vs Barnes

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Barnes by 2 projected points.

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Barnes

NEWCASTLE · MID · £6.1

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

COV (A)AVL (H)CRY (A)EVE (H)FUL (A)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£6.1

31Total points28

7.0Form3.7

5.2Points / game5.6

0.5%Owned8.2%

521Minutes450

1Goals1

3Assists3

1.02xG0.62

0.42xA0.48

21.9ICT28.2

3.4Avg FDR (5)2.8

16Projected pts17

The verdict

Barnes comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (17 vs 16), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 2.8) and a stronger underlying profile.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Barnes is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Kamada vs Groß Kamada vs Schade Kamada vs Rogers Kamada vs Belloumi Kamada vs Palmer Kamada vs Cunha