Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 9 points for Palacios and 22 for Palmer, so Palmer is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Palacios vs Palmer

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Palmer by 13 projected points.

Palacios

IPSWICH TOWN · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

FUL (H)MCI (A)NFO (H)HUL (A)BOU (H)

Palmer

CHELSEA · MID · £9.7

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

BOU (H)EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£9.7

12Total points36

1.5Form5.0

2.4Points / game6.0

0.1%Owned25.1%

302Minutes529

0Goals2

0Assists4

0.00xG1.31

0.11xA0.86

10.6ICT44.1

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.0

9Projected pts22

The verdict

Palmer comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (22 vs 9), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Palacios.

Buy — Palmer is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Palacios vs Groß Palacios vs Cherki Palacios vs Schade Palacios vs Rogers Palacios vs Belloumi Palacios vs Semenyo