Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Palacios and 28 for Palmer, so Palmer is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Palacios vs Palmer

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Palmer by 25 projected points.

Palacios

IPSWICH TOWN · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

MUN (A)LIV (H)CRY (A)EVE (A)FUL (H)

Palmer

CHELSEA · MID · £9.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

BHA (H)ARS (A)HUL (H)BRE (A)BOU (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£9.5

0Total points13

0.0Form13.0

0.0Points / game13.0

0.0%Owned16.4%

0Minutes82

0Goals1

0Assists1

0.00xG0.28

0.00xA0.19

0.0ICT16.1

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

3Projected pts28

The verdict

Palmer comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (28 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Palacios.

Buy — Palmer is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Palacios vs Hinshelwood Palacios vs M.Sangaré Palacios vs Stach Palacios vs Gakpo Palacios vs Ødegaard Palacios vs Dewsbury-Hall