Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 9 points for Palacios and 15 for Schade, so Schade is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Palacios vs Schade

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Schade by 6 projected points.

Palacios

IPSWICH TOWN · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

FUL (H)MCI (A)NFO (H)HUL (A)BOU (H)

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Hold50%

AVL (A)LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£6.2

12Total points40

1.5Form5.0

2.4Points / game6.7

0.1%Owned15.4%

302Minutes498

0Goals3

0Assists2

0.00xG1.93

0.11xA0.33

10.6ICT35.4

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.2

9Projected pts15

The verdict

Schade comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (15 vs 9), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Palacios.

Hold — Schade is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More MID comparisons

Palacios vs Groß Palacios vs Cherki Palacios vs Rogers Palacios vs Belloumi Palacios vs Palmer Palacios vs Semenyo