Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Mateta and 16 for Brobbey, so Brobbey is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Mateta vs Brobbey

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Brobbey by 14 projected points.

Mateta

CRYSTAL PALACE · FWD · £6.3

projected points / 5 GW

Sell94%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Brobbey

SUNDERLAND · FWD · £5.7

projected points / 5 GW

Hold64%

BHA (H)BOU (A)LEE (H)COV (A)CHE (H)

Stat by stat

£6.3Price£5.7

2Total points24

0.0Form6.7

2.0Points / game4.8

1.3%Owned6.9%

62Minutes399

0Goals3

0Assists0

0.70xG2.94

0.02xA0.11

2.5ICT31.7

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.0

3Projected pts16

The verdict

Brobbey comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (16 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Mateta.

Hold — Brobbey is fine to keep, but there is no urgent case to bring him in.

More FWD comparisons

Mateta vs Haaland Mateta vs João Pedro Mateta vs Isak Mateta vs Kostoulas Mateta vs Emersonn Mateta vs Calvert-Lewin