Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 23 points for Schade and 29 for Saka, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Schade vs Saka

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 5 projected points.

Schade

BRENTFORD · MID · £6.2

projected points / 5 GW

Buy85%

AVL (A)LIV (H)HUL (A)NFO (H)BHA (A)

Saka

ARSENAL · MID · £9.6

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Stat by stat

£6.2Price£9.6

39Total points32

12.0Form5.0

7.8Points / game6.4

12.3%Owned14.4%

447Minutes416

3Goals3

2Assists0

1.52xG3.22

0.32xA0.98

35.4ICT52.1

3.2Avg FDR (5)3.0

23Projected pts29

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (29 vs 23), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Schade vs Groß Schade vs Cherki Schade vs Semenyo Schade vs Gakpo Schade vs Tavernier Schade vs Belloumi