Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 21 points for Schade and 38 for Saka, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Schade vs Saka

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 17 projected points.

Schade

Brentford · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

TOT (H)LEE (A)SUN (H)BOU (A)CHE (H)

Saka

Arsenal · MID · £9.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

COV (H)AVL (A)CHE (H)SUN (A)BHA (A)

Stat by stat

£6.0Price£9.5

3Total points9

3.0Form9.0

3.0Points / game9.0

3.6%Owned9.7%

90Minutes67

0Goals1

0Assists0

0.43xG0.64

0.01xA0.08

0.0ICT0.0

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.2

21Projected pts38

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (38 vs 21), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Buy — Schade is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Schade vs M.Sangaré Schade vs Stach Schade vs Ødegaard Schade vs Dewsbury-Hall Schade vs Lewis-Potter Schade vs Janelt