Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 3 points for Caicedo and 29 for Saka, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Caicedo vs Saka

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 26 projected points.

Caicedo

CHELSEA · MID · £5.3

projected points / 5 GW

Sell92%

BOU (H)EVE (A)TOT (H)MUN (H)SUN (A)

Saka

ARSENAL · MID · £9.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Stat by stat

£5.3Price£9.5

1Total points32

0.0Form5.8

1.0Points / game6.4

1.0%Owned13.7%

13Minutes416

0Goals3

0Assists0

0.00xG3.22

0.00xA0.98

0.0ICT52.1

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.0

3Projected pts29

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (29 vs 3), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Caicedo.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Caicedo vs Groß Caicedo vs Schade Caicedo vs Cherki Caicedo vs Semenyo Caicedo vs Gakpo Caicedo vs Tavernier