Gravenberch or Scott?

Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 7 points for Gravenberch and 17 for Scott, so Scott is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Gravenberch vs Scott

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Scott by 10 projected points.

Gravenberch

LIVERPOOL · MID · £5.8

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

MCI (H)BRE (A)BHA (H)ARS (H)CRY (A)

Scott

BOURNEMOUTH · MID · £6.1

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

CHE (A)SUN (H)MUN (A)LEE (H)IPS (A)

Stat by stat

£5.8Price£6.1

9Total points30

1.0Form5.3

1.8Points / game6.0

1.1%Owned5.8%

190Minutes446

0Goals1

1Assists2

0.10xG0.64

0.08xA0.42

9.9ICT30.5

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.2

7Projected pts17

The verdict

Scott comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (17 vs 7), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.2) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Gravenberch.

Buy — Scott is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Gravenberch vs Groß Gravenberch vs Schade Gravenberch vs Cherki Gravenberch vs Semenyo Gravenberch vs Saka Gravenberch vs Gakpo