Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 7 points for Gravenberch and 29 for Saka, so Saka is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Gravenberch vs Saka

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Saka by 22 projected points.

Gravenberch

LIVERPOOL · MID · £5.8

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

MCI (H)BRE (A)BHA (H)ARS (H)CRY (A)

Saka

ARSENAL · MID · £9.5

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

LEE (H)NFO (A)EVE (H)LIV (A)HUL (H)

Stat by stat

£5.8Price£9.5

9Total points32

1.0Form5.8

1.8Points / game6.4

1.1%Owned13.7%

190Minutes416

0Goals3

1Assists0

0.10xG3.22

0.08xA0.98

9.9ICT52.1

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.0

7Projected pts29

The verdict

Saka comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (29 vs 7), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.0) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Gravenberch.

Buy — Saka is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Gravenberch vs Groß Gravenberch vs Schade Gravenberch vs Cherki Gravenberch vs Semenyo Gravenberch vs Gakpo Gravenberch vs Tavernier