Gravenberch or Stach?

Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 7 points for Gravenberch and 17 for Stach, so Stach is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Gravenberch vs Stach

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Stach by 10 projected points.

Gravenberch

LIVERPOOL · MID · £5.8

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

MCI (H)BRE (A)BHA (H)ARS (H)CRY (A)

Stach

LEEDS · MID · £6.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy71%

ARS (A)MUN (H)SUN (A)BOU (A)TOT (H)

Stat by stat

£5.8Price£6.0

9Total points27

1.0Form3.3

1.8Points / game5.4

1.1%Owned2.5%

190Minutes447

0Goals1

1Assists0

0.10xG0.97

0.08xA0.31

9.9ICT26.5

3.4Avg FDR (5)3.4

7Projected pts17

The verdict

Stach comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (17 vs 7), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Gravenberch.

Buy — Stach is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Gravenberch vs Groß Gravenberch vs Schade Gravenberch vs Cherki Gravenberch vs Semenyo Gravenberch vs Saka Gravenberch vs Gakpo