Over the next five gameweeks our model projects 9 points for Palacios and 14 for Kamada, so Kamada is the pick.

What does this comparison account for?

Price, ownership, form, expected goals and assists per 90, minutes reliability, and the difficulty of each player's next five fixtures.

Palacios vs Kamada

Head-to-head over the next 5 gameweeks. Our model favours Kamada by 5 projected points.

Palacios

IPSWICH TOWN · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Sell64%

FUL (H)MCI (A)NFO (H)HUL (A)BOU (H)

Kamada

CRYSTAL PALACE · MID · £5.0

projected points / 5 GW

Buy78%

NFO (H)BHA (A)NEW (H)TOT (A)LIV (H)

Stat by stat

£5.0Price£5.0

12Total points29

1.5Form5.5

2.4Points / game4.8

0.1%Owned0.6%

302Minutes530

0Goals1

0Assists3

0.00xG0.81

0.11xA0.42

10.6ICT21.9

3.0Avg FDR (5)3.4

9Projected pts14

The verdict

Kamada comes out ahead on the five-gameweek projection (14 vs 9), largely because of the fixture run (average difficulty 3.4) and better current form.

Sell — the projection, fixtures or minutes do not support keeping Palacios.

Buy — Kamada is one of the better MID options for the next 5 gameweeks.

More MID comparisons

Palacios vs Groß Palacios vs Cherki Palacios vs Schade Palacios vs Rogers Palacios vs Belloumi Palacios vs Palmer